Which term refers to the amount of proof required to determine someone is guilty?

The correct term that refers to the amount of proof required to determine someone is guilty is the "Standard of proof." This concept is crucial in legal proceedings as it establishes the level of certainty that must be achieved for a party to prevail in a legal case. In criminal cases, for example, the standard of proof is typically "beyond a reasonable doubt," meaning that the evidence presented must be so compelling that there are no reasonable grounds for doubt about the defendant's guilt.

The burden of proof denotes the responsibility on a party to present enough evidence to support their claims or defenses, but it is the standard of proof that sets the threshold for the evidence's sufficiency. The terms "proof of guilt" and "evidence requirement" do not accurately capture the legal metric that defines how much evidence is needed to establish guilt, focusing more on specific aspects of the overall evidentiary process rather than the established threshold necessary for a verdict.