Which of the following can be an outcome of effective peer reviews?

An outcome of effective peer reviews is the enhanced quality of writing through constructive feedback. When individuals engage in peer review, they provide and receive specific, targeted feedback that can highlight areas for improvement, such as clarity, coherence, grammar, and overall argument strength. This collaborative process allows writers to see their work from different perspectives, identify weaknesses, and gain insights on how to refine their writing. By implementing the suggestions made by peers, writers can improve their skills and the overall quality of their written work, leading to better and more polished final products.

While increased publication rates, higher grades in writing assignments, and broader topics can result from various factors in the academic process, these are not direct outcomes of the peer review process. Instead, the primary benefit of peer reviews lies in the constructive feedback that fosters writing development and quality enhancement.